User talk:TrangaBellam

manavyAḷakinca rAdaṭE
marmamella telpedanE manasA
ghanuḍaina rAma candruni
karuṇAntaraṅgamu telisina nA (manavi)
karma kAṇḍa matAkṛṣṭulai bhava
gahana cArulai gAsi jendaga
kani mAnavAvatAruḍai
kanipiñcinAḍE naḍata tyAgarAju (manavi)

— Tyagaraja

Yes, I do suffer from something of what the Japanese called a hōgan-biiki (判官贔屓) empathy in my approach to the world. It does influence what attracts my attention, meaning I sympathise with the silenced underdog in so many conflicts, be they Aboriginals or Palestinians or Tibetans. This as far as I am aware does not translate into being uncomfortable with my country of origins, or antisemitic, or hostile to Chinese. From distinct backgrounds, I gather, several editors share this interest and they tend to work well together because they subscribe to the same principles of evidence which are commended in academia as they are on wikipedia as ideals.
— Nishidani, en-wiki

Archives

Talk,

2021, 2022,

list

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Pr.

Ruhnama - Low priority.
Hasmukh Dhirajlal Sankalia - Low priority.
The Story of Civilization - High priority.
R. C. Majumdar - Medium priority.
Satish Chandra Mittal - Low priority.
Fronda
Waldemar Chrostowski
Ryszard Bender
Zdzisław Krasnodębski (sociologist)
Antoni Dudek
Dariusz Jarosz

To Read

THE EVOLUTION OF ANTLER AND BONE CHEEKPIECES FROM THE BALKAN-CARPATHIAN REGION TO CENTRAL KAZAKHSTAN: CHRONOLOGY OF “CHARIOT” CULTURES AND MYCENAEAN GREECE
Politics, gender, and the Islamic past: The Legacy of ʻAʼisha bint Abi Bakr

Your GA nomination of Rai dynasty

The article Rai dynasty you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Rai dynasty for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 12:43, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have barely a thousand edits to the project and are impolite; stay the fuck away from reviewing my articles. If you were unwilling to copy-edit the prose, you could have said that. TrangaBellam (talk) 12:51, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rollinginhisgrave You can withdraw from the review. TrangaBellam (talk) 13:11, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Hello TrangaBellam: I hope you did not think I was being brusque or cutting you off when I replied to your post on my talk page in the manner in which I did. I figured I'll get a few days off and take my mind away from WP-related things. Anyway, as you can see my block has expired and I want to thank you for you post. I notice you have also made some posts on Talk:Mahatma Gandhi. I look forward to reading them, as usual. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 17:48, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Witzel revert

It looks to me like you reverted a bunch of genuine improvements (that had been made by JJ in response to the activity you mentioned in your edit summary)? 100.36.106.199 (talk) 02:09, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It seems JJ has reimplemented the improvements you reverted, so this is moot. 100.36.106.199 (talk) 10:37, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for keeping an eye, both of you. I'm finally getting the overall pattern: Indus-Sarasvati civilisation, ancient Hinduism, Indian subcontinent, etc.: all Hindutva-politics at play at Wikipedia. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 11:08, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sultanate of Bijapur GA review

Are you planning to do this sometime soon? It's been more than a month now; should I find a different reviewer? Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 22:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was (and am) reading the sources, etc. — unlike other GA reviewers, I believe reviewers must have relevant subject expertise. TrangaBellam (talk) 16:49, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]