Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/@$$

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Leet. (non-admin closure) NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 02:30, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@$$

This article has no content apart from a box saying 'search Wiktionary for Appendix:Internet slang'. I've checked 'Appendix:Internet slang' in Wiktionary and found no mention of '@$$'. Also, the title is offensive and it does not descibe the origin of '@$$' or usage, for example. Previous edits have shown vandalism, offensive language and a personal attack. Æåm Fætsøn (talk) 02:39, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

speedy keep Perfectly valid soft redirect. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 02:52, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Wikipedia is not censored and what one editor finds offensive is not so to another. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 03:36, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Ass. JJL (talk) 03:44, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, a valid soft redirect. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 03:59, 19 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Keep per WP:NOTCENSORED. Cosmic Latte (talk) 06:46, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTRETARDED. What? How in the hell is this useful as a soft redirect for anything? Its totally not plausible. JBsupreme (talk) 10:04, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Leet as a plausible search term - the current soft redirect target does not mention "@$$" and hence is pretty useless. ~ mazca ^t|c 11:42, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- Redirects are cheap. And last I checked, we're WP:NOTCENSORED Umbralcorax (talk) 17:16, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Redirects are cheap as noted above. Also, per WP:NOTCENSORED and WP:IDONTLIKEIT, aspects of the nom's rationale for deleting I don't consider to be valid. Is there anyone left in the world who still finds the word "ass" (which obviously @$$ references) offensive? 23skidoo (talk) 13:12, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a redirect (either to Leet, or Ass or pretty much anywhere) as a way to avoid having to delete vandalism from the page; if we delete it, it'll just get recreated; better to leave it as a redirect. Of course, making it a banned title would work too. And if we don't have any citations showing its use in the language, maybe it should be deleted. Citations, anyone? (Note: I'm the original creator of the redirect, based on the fact that, when I created it, @$$ was listed on the List of internet slang to which I redirected it.) JesseW, the juggling janitor 23:56, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.