Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MS Prince Albert II
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Snow keep and per WP:HEY. TravellingCari 03:12, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
MS Prince Albert II[edit]
- MS Prince Albert II (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete nothing to indicate the notability of this ship. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 02:18, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep if sourced. The ship does appear to be a major new expedition-class cruise ship which is a growing but still narrow category. --Dhartung | Talk 05:03, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - it's a big ship that people might search for on wikipedia. - Richard Cavell (talk) 06:32, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless this article can be expanded to at least one paragraph with notability and a reference. In its current state it may as well stay on the parent article. --Brad (talk) 00:38, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - expanded from a one sentence stub and sourced. There's quite a wide range of sources out there once you start looking, and notability has not been an issue with ships like these. Benea (talk) 01:49, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Ships of this size are generally considered to be automatically notable. Excellent work on expanding the article, Benea. Parsecboy (talk) 02:18, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, seems notable enough. What's wrong with trying to improve before trying to delete? — Bellhalla (talk) 03:14, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - ships of this size are automatically notable and per Benea. -MBK004 03:36, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, now that the article has been expanded and references added. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:53, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.