Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ship decommissioning

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Ship commissioning. Move/rename proposals can occur at the appropriate talk page. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 22:13, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ship decommissioning

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In this state not more than a dictionary entry so can be moved to the sister project Wiktionary. The Banner talk 21:50, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:19, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to Ship commissioning, as that article should cover "both ends", as it were. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:57, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Bushranger, and expand if at all possible on that page. Ansh6 6 6 05:05, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect, but rename target to Ship commissioning and decommissioning. Neutrality^talk 20:00, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.