Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stacey Daniella Gabriel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stacey Daniella Gabriel[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

AFD as I placed the wrong PROD and it should not be PROD again. She is not notable enough for inclusion, she is the runner-up of Miss Universe Philippines 2024. She is not the winner of the competition. Google search turn up results about her in the competition, but it is not notable enough. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 18:30, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Beauty pageants, and Philippines. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 18:30, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non notable pageant titleholder { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 15:47, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe she is notable enough through her career as an actress as well as her previous stints in other beauty pageants such as Binibining Pilipinas, not to mention she has a large fan base and can easily be notable as an influencer. NathalieMendoza (talk) 06:33, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: While this article had a BLPPROD, not a PROD, I'm stating that this article is not eligible for Soft Deletion due to the unbolded Keep statement in this discussion. Also, "notability" can't just be claimed, it has to be demonstrated through significant coverage in independent, secondary, reliable sources. Do those exist?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:56, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

weak delete: Some critical notice of her advocacy [1], but that's about all I can find. Oaktree b (talk) 22:40, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.