Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Wagtail's Army

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Curbon7 (talk) 03:18, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Wagtail's Army[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Soviet Latvian film for children with no real coverage in reliable sources.--Владимир Бежкрабчжян (talk) 08:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:06, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:06, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Google books give some results: Book by Fyodor Razzakov [ru], where it is written that the film inspired extremely popular The Elusive Avengers. It is mentioned in book Voices in Labyrinth (Голоса в лабиринте). Google gives several results where someone mentions that he watched the film, or remembered it, indicating that it was famous film. In the book Cinema of soviet Latvia (Кино Советской Латвии) the following is written (page 69):"the special place has the work of Aleksandrs Leimanis, whose films, The Wagtail's Army and its sequel, still are deservedly popular. The search made me sure the film was famous, though hardly there would be English language sources on film. Keep. Kirill C1 (talk) 16:11, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:42, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per the reliable book sources identified above, also noting that references do not have to be in english for WP:GNG, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 08:00, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:49, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per book references listed by Kirill C1. Dr.KBAHT (talk) 04:24, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep book references are coverage for that. Alimovvarsu (talk) 18:27, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.