Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USS Turbot (SS-427)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:26, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

USS Turbot (SS-427)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ship was cancelled, should be redirected unless community believes its useful. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 14:57, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Against deletion. I'm not a sub buff and just a layman, but I found this information useful today for a publication I'm doing covering the N. Severn Naval Complex (this sub located there for decades; it was a local landmark of some notoriety; this tiny creek (Carr Creek) is lined with public hiking trails from the adjacent public Greenbury Point Nature Center. The nearest WP feature, the Greenbury Point Lighthouse is no longer present, but the WP article remains. DLinth (talk) 15:32, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to class article. Brad (talk) 08:33, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:57, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is a well referenced article about a named ship of the United States Navy which is described in the Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships. Though never completed, this submarine was used for research purposes for many years. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:56, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is a well referenced article about a named ship of the United States Navy.FFA P-16 (talk) 17:22, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to class article, never completed. Kierzek (talk) 17:44, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - Well referenced, actual ship. I think that never completed isn't the same as not completed to original specifications. Passes V, NOR, NPOV, and entry in NAFS is not trivial. Smmurphy^(Talk) 18:18, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep I wasn't able to find any particularly noteworthy sources for the submarine beyond those cited in the article, but I believe these sources are numerous enough and provide enough information for the USS Turbot to meet notability requirements. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:05, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.