Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 July 3

< July 2	July 4 >

July 3

File:Dell-logo 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, redundant to File:Dell Logo.svg, ect, no foreseeable use. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:14, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Facebook-logo234.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:37, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, redundant to File:Facebook icon.jpg, ect. , no foreseeable use. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:16, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well a jpeg is the wrong format for this image - it should be a png or svg. --B (talk) 01:24, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

keep delete the JPG instead. The PNG includes transparency, so the parts not part of the logo are not included in the file. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 03:09, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Feta Cheese crop2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded as a temporary file for an FPC candidate 2 years ago - orphaned and unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 07:21, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wasp anim cloning.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See above Acather96 (talk) 07:21, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Crested Tern Tasmania (edit) clipping.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See above Acather96 (talk) 07:22, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gran Dolina-Atapuerca-Panoramica crop4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See above Acather96 (talk) 07:23, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gran Dolina-Atapuerca-Panoramica crop3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See above Acather96 (talk) 07:24, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gran Dolina-Atapuerca-Panoramica crop1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See above Acather96 (talk) 07:24, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gran Dolina-Atapuerca-Panoramica crop2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See above Acather96 (talk) 07:25, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vierfleck Libellula quadrimaculata temp01.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See above Acather96 (talk) 07:25, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vierfleck Libellula quadrimaculata temp02.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See above Acather96 (talk) 07:25, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vierfleck Libellula quadrimaculata temp03.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See above Acather96 (talk) 07:26, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vierfleck Libellula quadrimaculata temp04.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See above Acather96 (talk) 07:26, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Thelwallrangersemblem.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, description states this is a temporary file. Acather96 (talk) 07:30, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Photographic masters home.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 07:32, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Guild profile help.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 07:33, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mercedes SLR C199 2007 amk edit temp.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded as a temporary file for an FPC candidate 4 years ago - orphaned and unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 07:35, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GG-ftpoint-bridge-2 copyright.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Description states this a temporary file for a FPC nom 4 years ago, orphaned and unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 07:38, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Omarmexsk9.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 07:44, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AAAAAA Bullet.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 07:47, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, useless. Acather96 (talk) 15:34, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:All-interval tetrachords.mid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 07:47, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See Image:All-interval tetrachords.png and All-interval tetrachord. Hyacinth (talk) 09:01, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Commons it is a sound file, and a low bandwith perfect representation since it is a MIDI file, thus a notation and not a digitalization file (which is why we prefer SVG over PNG, similarly, MIDI should be prefered over MP3/OGG/etc) 65.93.15.213 (talk) 05:32, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I assume by "we" you mean the Wikipedia project. Wikipedia:Manual of Style (music) doesn't mention MIDI or OGG while Wikipedia:Creation and usage of media files#Audio doesn't mention MIDI. Hyacinth (talk) 21:06, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's why I used the qualifier "should". MIDI files are just like vector graphics, in that they are instructions to recreate something, and not sampled/quantized/digitized/compressed recordings. 65.93.15.213 (talk) 05:13, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you should mention MIDI files, and their permissibility, at those two pages. Hyacinth (talk) 20:41, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Commons quite permissible on Commons and surely here as well given usage, no reason to delete —innotata 21:51, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Amoll.mid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 07:48, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See File:Amoll.svg & Aeolian mode. Hyacinth (talk) 08:48, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Commons it is a sound file, and a low bandwith perfect representation since it is a MIDI file, thus a notation and not a digitalization file (which is why we prefer SVG over PNG, similarly, MIDI should be prefered over MP3/OGG/etc) 65.93.15.213 (talk) 05:33, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Augmented third on C.mid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Hyacinth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:16, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 07:49, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Hyacinth (talk) 08:52, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bambiraptor showing specialised claw.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 07:49, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I can certainly foresee a use: on the article Bambiraptor. I also dispute that the image is "low-quality". Firsfron of Ronchester 08:46, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, then link it to the article. -FASTILY^>Fireworks!< 01:58, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to develop a section on the hindlimbs of Bambiraptor in which to place the image. Obviously, developing such a section will take a while. But whether or not the image is placed in the article at this time, I'd like to request that you avoid nominating fossil images for deletion like this. "No foreseeable use" is not at all the same as "not currently in use", and a fine photograph of a museum specimen is a big benefit to readers. It's not something that is easily replaceable. Firsfron of Ronchester 06:44, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Firsfron Buffs (talk) 05:19, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bask Chicago Lincoln Park Zoo Feb 2 2011 storm 2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:11, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, dark, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 07:50, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Both of these are in use on the user page of an active user. --B (talk) 03:53, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But they are just used in a gallery of the user's uploads, not in any meaningful way. –Drilnoth (T/C) 10:34, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, fine, if the user wants them, we can restore them temporarily and he/she can move them to Commons. --B (talk) 14:34, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bask Chicago Lincoln Park Zoo Feb 2 2011 storm.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:11, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, dark, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 07:50, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Both of these are in use on the user page of an active user. --B (talk) 03:53, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Beer League Logo Campy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:03, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. Possibly copyrighted FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 07:51, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bishzilla spin.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn; well, that was clearly not a popular move. -FASTILY^>Fireworks!< 02:09, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 08:13, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to know how wiki or the world is improved by deleting the Bishzilla image. The file is indeed an orphan as far as mainspace is concerned, but it's used on 14 pages (excluding archives, files for deletion, and similar), including Bishzilla's RFA [1] and User:Jimbo Wales/Facebook/friends. User:Bishzilla herself, whose rotating portrait you want so cruelly to delete, has a lively talkpage, which shows her to be an active and popular wikipedian (since 2006!). Maybe you'd like to take a look, Fastily? Don't you agree that it's the kind of user, and the kind of page, that needs a portrait or two? That is only some of the "foreseeable use", I'm sure her fans will be able to think of more. As an illustration of Bishzilla's good standing (despite being an alternative account, something she has never denied): she ran for arbcom in 2008, and received much support.[2][3][4] If you prick her, does she not bleed? :-( Bishonen | talk 14:29, 3 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Delete - exact equivalent of the same name on commons should do just fine, unless Bishonen has a huge problem with that. Magog the Ogre (talk) 14:34, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(e/c) I do have a problem, Magog, since images on Commons, in my experience, live more dangerously than on enwiki (and thereby are not exactly equivalent). That's why I and others tag them with KeepLocal. Bishonen | talk 14:57, 3 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]

It's tagged KeepLocal, which is a request to have a local copy of the file. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:50, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Public domain image, user-created, used in userspace. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:50, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep; Nikki said it well. Sometimes "keeplocal" is preferred for userspace things that are intended principally for enwiki, which seems to be the case here. Antandrus (talk) 15:20, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, please. It is not orphaned. It is used in userspace. It is using up 108 kilobites of space. Deleting that would not exactly clear up a lot of server space! Tex (talk) 15:33, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, useful to show wrath of Bishzilla. Aren't there Wikilove kittens that could be deleted instead? —Kusma (t·c) 16:25, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Nikkimaria. This image is specific to userpages on English Wikipedia; while I'm sure nobody objects to it being used elsewhere, moving it to Commons puts it at serious risk of deletion or undiscussed modification there, without advance notice to the users on whose pages this image appears. Risker (talk) 17:55, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep only relevance is enwiki. Agathoclea (talk) 18:50, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – the file history is of importance in illustrating how not to use {{Now Commons}} and in charting the development of the Giano and Bishonen Clique. --RexxS (talk) 23:16, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Generally, users may upload a few personal images for use in their userspace and elsewhere. No reason to doubt the images licensing, so keep as a personal image. Keep local because personal images are more likely to get deleted at Commons because there's no reason why they would find the image useful. Recommend SNOW keep. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:24, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good. Delete bad. First came for lizard... --Floquenstein's monster (talk) 23:49, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep...OR ELSE!--MONGO 04:08, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Snowball keep per above. Buffs (talk) 05:21, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - though it does nobody any harm and includes no salacious elements,[5] it should still be kept as an important part of institutional memory. Tom Harrison ^Talk 12:46, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
GRawRRRR Keep ... no like delete sister spinny profile pic thingy. Chedzilla (talk) 17:50, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bizmut nitrat.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:05, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 08:13, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Black and red line.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:03, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 08:14, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Black line.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:03, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 08:14, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Blue eagle.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 08:14, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In use at User:Atb129/sandbox. --B (talk) 03:54, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brad Delson griffith.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:05, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no foreseeable use. Possibly copyrighted. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 08:15, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BSicon uxINTa.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:10, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 08:15, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BSicon uxINTe.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:10, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 08:15, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Captain Sam Yosemite Indian Mono Paiute.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 08:17, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CFL stopping train.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 08:17, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- duplicate exists on Commons. (Quite easy to see a foreseeable use though -- in an article on the train type, or the train company). Jheald (talk) 11:20, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chacalaspacer35.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 08:18, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Character Long Semi.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 08:18, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment- You may want to delete it's related one which is a .jpg (?) too, this is just a .svg image I made of it. JoeGazz ▲ 15:06, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chenghua.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:37, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 08:18, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's a portrait of the Chinese Emperor Chenghua (1447-1487), and should be kept and moved to Commons if we can confirm its original origins. Jheald (talk) 11:26, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
keep' Clearly has practical use for the article about him. Fastily, you are using the same rationale for a wider range of files, some of which do have obvious potential uses. Perhaps you ought to explain each time why they do not.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cross Country Skiing Belden Ave Chicago Feb 2 2011.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 08:19, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons illustrates how bad snowstorms can make it easier to ski rather than anything else in an urban area. 65.93.15.213 (talk) 05:30, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Move to commons no reason to delete —innotata 21:56, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dante Emerging from the Pit of Hell.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. Possibly copyrighted. Missing evidence of permission FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 08:20, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently self-created art. Not appropriate. Jheald (talk) 11:28, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Declaration-of-independence-broadside.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 08:20, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons illustration of a historic document in its original form. 65.93.15.213 (talk) 05:29, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why?? Commons already has many full-length scans of the Declaration of Independence. This photo is a half copy of the declaration; it is not logical to transfer redundant pieces of this document to commons. -FASTILY^>Fireworks!< 02:03, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Deletion screen screenshot.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 08:21, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Delmart Vreeland Note.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 08:21, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's orphaned because someone removed it from each of the articles to which it had been attached. The author is Delmart Vreeland. "no forseeable use?" I don't understand how that is cogent, there is no need to 'Fore' see it, it already WAS being used. User:Pedant (talk) 05:43, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Denar of Boleslaw II.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 08:25, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep potential use for two articles that article about him, and an article about the coin itself. Poor quality is not a reason for deletion until we have a better quality available. DGG ( talk )

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Detail hrapbrown.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 08:25, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep potential use for two articles that article about him, and an article about the coin itself. Poor quality is not a reason for deletion until we have a better quality available. DGG ( talk ) 05:21, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dominant thirteenth chord on C m13.mid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 08:26, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See the newly created Image:Dominant thirteenth chord on C m13.png and Thirteenth#Gallery. Hyacinth (talk) 10:26, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Commons it is a sound file, and a low bandwith perfect representation since it is a MIDI file, thus a notation and not a digitalization file (which is why we prefer SVG over PNG, similarly, MIDI should be prefered over MP3/OGG/etc) 65.93.15.213 (talk) 05:27, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DruryHotelHaytiMO.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 08:26, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep potential use for articles about the hotel, and therefore encyclopedic Poor quality is not a reason for deletion until we have a better quality available. DGG ( talk )

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Edmonds Waterfront.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:05, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 08:27, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ElbridgeGLaphamUSSenNY.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 08:28, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's evidently a derivative drawing from the photo that we have at Elbridge G. Lapham. But I'm not sure it's necessarily useless. Since it's free (US Govt publication), why not move it to Commons? Jheald (talk) 11:46, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
move to Commons no reason to delete. —innotata 21:46, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Eleventh chord C11 chord.mid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 08:29, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See Image:Eleventh chord C11 chord.png and eleventh chord. Hyacinth (talk) 10:02, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, currently used in its article, and evidently useful. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:34, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Commons it is a sound file, and a low bandwith perfect representation since it is a MIDI file, thus a notation and not a digitalization file (which is why we prefer SVG over PNG, similarly, MIDI should be prefered over MP3/OGG/etc) 65.93.15.213 (talk) 05:27, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Epbfl.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 08:29, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flag of the kalmar union.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 08:30, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment replaceable with File:Flag of the Kalmar Union.svg. 65.93.15.213 (talk) 05:24, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BB Won over Hands Played for ElT007 (2010-10-17, $20+).jpg and others

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete all except last 2. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:11, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Personal_profit_graph.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

Incomplete nom, usage of WP as a photo site to store personal poker data. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 13:41, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep until upleader is notified. Agathoclea (talk) 07:36, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There has already been an MfD regarding the pages that used these images and a slew of deletions a month ago with more of these charts. The original nominator of the MfD, the June 1 deletions, and all but the last 2 files above is damiens.rf (talk · contribs). That user warned TonyTheTiger of all the deletions (except the last 2), as seen in these edits. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 19:32, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader was not notified of this FFD. The previous deletion request specifically stated that there where some images left which where not nominated on purpose. Deleting those now without informing the uploader would be underhand. Agathoclea (talk) 06:58, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Where do you see the specific statement that there were some images not deleted? User has been notified.— Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 02:04, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As the original uploader, I am in favor of deleting all except those used at User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon. Thus I only want to keep, the following: File:Personal profit graph.png and File:Cumulative 20andup Allin BB Won over Hands Played for ElT007 no watermark.jpg. AFAI am concerned you can speedy the rest uncontested.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:28, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep remaining two as used on personal subpage. Agathoclea (talk) 08:43, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And the one that has watermarked versions in its history may be deletable as unfree...— Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 22:02, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

watermarked versions in its history? If the version at issue has not watermark why would that be a problem?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:01, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Littlewoods Cup.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:29, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No reason to believe it's freely licensed. damiens.rf 16:37, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't. Uploaded when I was a noob, delete. —Cliftonian^{the orangey bit} 16:44, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Farhad mehrad.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Contrary to the rationale, this image is not used as album cover image in a section, but as portrait of a person article in the infobox. The Evil IP address (talk) 18:54, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Geoblkwiki.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vanity photo used on recently deleted autobiographical article. —Ryūlóng (竜龙) 19:17, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete but this still applies. Agathoclea (talk) 20:33, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Klitschko vs. Haye.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:12, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free advertisement poster of a boxing fight. It seems a general practice has developed that many such articles have similar pictures, but this practice is problematic under WP:NFCC. This nomination is therefore a pilot nomination for potentially many others. The identificatory value of these posters is low (they all look essentially the same, showing portraits of the two boxers in fighting pose with some surrounding text). I doubt such posters serve a general identificatory function similar to cover art or logos, such that readers are likely to identify and recognise the event primarily by means of these images. FURs are meaningless: "it shows the subject(s) of this article and the sporting event promoted" – the first function could be served by any pair of free portraits of the athletes, and the second is plain wrong, as it in fact doesn't show the event itself. Free pictures of the event itself could in fact be taken by a spectator during the fight. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:07, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree that it is not essential for understanding the subject of the article. Mtking (talk) 23:57, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Lean to keep, as it shows how in promotional material the fight was presented; our use (for an encyclopedia article) is transformative, and the commercial value of the copyright taking is essentially nil -- so we shouldn't be setting the bar for significance very high. But I would like to see the poster made less prominent (i.e. smaller) on the page. Jheald (talk) 11:55, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep potential use for articles about the max, and about the boxers. and therefore encyclopedic These publicity posters are often not even copyright. Poor quality is not a reason for deletion until we have a better quality available. As a picture of the fighters in conjunction it is important in illustrating the fight itself. . DGG ( talk )
Keep An image is worth more than a thousand words, and especially in this case (and probably many others, too) it really speaks a lot. It's like with the album covers, they give something to the article that no words could ever describe like that. Just looking at the image, e.g. the different portrayals of Klitschko and Haye already tell me a lot about what happened during the preliminary stages of the fight. We would embed such an image without any questions if it were free, so why not make use of fair use here? --The Evil IP address (talk) 21:03, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Point Valid.jpg and File:Point Valid, with Catherine Asaro.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:11, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged on flickr as being free licensed, but with "no derivatives", which is not a Wikipedia-compatible license. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:21, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the one with Catherine Asaro, there is a Commons version with an OTRS ticket, File:PointValidWithCatherineAsaro2008.jpg. 65.93.15.213 (talk) 05:21, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Deleted, thanks for finding that! –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 13:47, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment it seems as though an OTRS ticket can be obtained for the remaining one, the one without Catherine Asaro. 65.93.15.213 (talk) 05:21, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Miley Cyrus performing in her Gypsy Heart Tour.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Does not meet fair use rules, could be replaced, and not essential for the article. Mtking (talk) 23:47, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. Jheald (talk) 11:57, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep important for illustrating the tour and therefore encyclopedic.If it is replaceable, which may not be the case, delete when a free version is found, but not until them.— Preceding unsigned comment added by DGG (talk • contribs) 05:11, 7 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]
- It's replaceable, because there are already at least four free images from the same tour in the article. QED. Also, why does it illustrate the tour? We can't see the stage, or the backdrop, or anything that makes this just another non-free photo of a living person. Black Kite (t) (c) 17:18, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete article currently has five images that do much more than this one in illustrating the tour itself. Skier Dude (talk) 04:28, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my reply to DGG above. Black Kite (t) (c) 17:18, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.