Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nauman335

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nauman335

Nauman335 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

15 June 2024[edit]

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

IP has created Draft:Zard patton ka bunn - Previously articles on same topic were created by socks of master at Zard Patton Ka Bunn, Draft:Zard Patton Ka Band, and Draft:Zard Patton Ka Bunn (drama) Saqib (talk I contribs) 22:23, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Socks of Nauman335 are known for creating articles on same topics using slightly different titles. Is there any connection with @Knowrz7747 (creator of Draft:UmroAyyar A New Beginning) and/or @SaadTheLegend (creator of Draft:Umro Ayyar - A New Beginning). Earlier today Sunaola a sock of master also edited Draft:Umro Ayyar - A New Beginning..
Fwiw - another sock puppet Taiyabi created Draft:Umro Ayyar- A New Begining.--Saqib (talk I contribs) 23:30, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • The IP is Nauman335, nobody has ever tried to create or edit any of the multiple pages they've created on that show that hasn't been a sock. Draft deleted and title blacklisted.
  • Both accounts are strongly Red X Unrelated. Closing. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 12:31, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

16 June 2024[edit]

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

This IP today reverted a redirect amd restored a page on a non-notable HUM TV show called Very Filmy that was originally created by socks of @Nauman335. In their edit summary, they claimed, Two editors thought its notable (on talkpage). AFD if disagree. However, according to the tp discussion, one of those two editors, @Mushy Yank, who thought it was notable also suggested redirecting it, so the consensus was actually to redirect the page. IP suggested taking it to AfD, because they know they will cast keep votes using different IPs to rescue the page. Fwiw, the page was draftified by Pppery but was moved to main NS without any review. --Saqib (talk I contribs) 00:53, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ivanvector: The point is if is it safe to revert this edit or not?— Saqib (talk I contribs) 00:54, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sure - so it doesn't falls under G5? — Saqib (talk I contribs) 16:06, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • IP /24 range blocked two weeks. I suggest taking the article to AfD, the controversy around the show using racism for views may make it notable, if better sources exist. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 12:14, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

20 June 2024[edit]

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

An article was created @ Draft:Na Baligh Afraad on 6 June - I draftified it because it failed to meet GNG. A few days later, @Mfarazbaig re-created Na Baligh Afraad. I draftified it too and clearly mentioned to submit it for review before moving back to main NS. Today, @Mfarazbaig unilaterally moved it back to the main NS without making any effort to address my concerns, saying that “Anyone who disagrees can take it to the AfD”. The similar type of editing behaviour was recently noted by a blocked IP of master account 39.34.135.244 (talk · contribs · 39.34.135.244 WHOIS). It's worth noting that Draft:Na Baligh Afraad has been edited by socks of master account. Moreover, @Mfarazbaig has been previously accused of engaging in UPE by several admins and was a suspected sock of multiple sock farms. In-fact he remained blocked from 2017 to 2023. Saqib (talk I contribs) 17:58, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They also recently created a PROMO article on SadaPay which was previously created multiple times by UPEs. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 18:05, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]